Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris Bateman's avatar

Dear Caroline,

I do so love a good rant, and this is a corker! But still, we have our fundamental disagreement - which, I stress, we are able to talk about, which makes us somehow remarkable in an age where disagreement is forbidden.

"It still beggars belief that there are still good people out there who believe the Great Reset is just a series of ‘cock-ups.’ It pains me because there is such a range of high-quality evidence out there in the public domain. It is a lot of reading, I have done it..."

You and I have probably read all the same material in this regard, but our conclusions are a little different. I think this is because my standards of evidence are tighter, which is not an insult to you - my standards of evidence could be too high (probably they are), but I am hardly in a position to change my standards, even while almost everyone else seems to do so at a whim. This is simply just a difference between me and other people, one that I think is valuable. If everyone's standards of evidence were as tight as mine, we'd be in serious trouble! 🙂

In fact, I've probably read a lot more than you on some topics (especially those damnable face masks) as for two years I read every academic paper released on the topic as it was released. This was a horrible experience. But I would not erase it from my memory, as it was also important. One thing it showed me was that the Nonsense (as I call it) was a confluence of desires and fears, in which the desires and fears of the ultrarich had disproportionate influence. And this was hardly a new discovery - it just came out in clearer relief at this time because the claims were even more insane than usual.

Our disagreement goes to what proportion of these events to ascribe to maliciousness rather than incompetence. I am currently unpersuaded by claims that this was intentionally pursued as a depopulation event (a view I think you hold). This is in part because SARS-CoV-2 is hopelessly ill-suited to this purpose, and the mod-mRNA failed vaccine candidates aren't actually much better at this either, despite being such a horrendous disaster. So even if this were someone's nefarious goal, we would have to conclude that they were incompetent in going about it. I personally feel it is more parsimonious to presume that the incompetence is the through-line here, not the maliciousness. (Not caring about accidental depopulation is radically different from intentionally planning to do so.)

The WEF is not, I would suggest, a gathering of Bond villains at all, but rather an opportunity to gape in slack jawed amazement at the banal stupidity of the ultrarich. The incomparable Eugyppius has advanced the same view: I believe his analysis is the correct one. We should be grateful for the WEF for exposing the stupidity of the ultrarich. It is, in some bizarre way, comforting that they do not possess the genius-degree of intelligence of a Goldfinger or Blofeld. They are really quite shockingly *stupid*.

Intentionally co-ordinating the Nonsense for the purpose of the Great Reset looks very similar to taking advantage of the Nonsense to push through a previously desired agenda. I believe you favour the former interpretation, I favour the latter. But more so, because of my damnable standards of evidence, I cannot accept your interpretation without the missing pieces of the puzzle that make it fit together. I cannot find this evidence. Eugyppius' interpretation is far more robust.

None of this is a reason not to be angry. Believe me, I am still angry, and I fear I always will be about this. But I will not leap to one conclusion while other interpretations are available and supported by the same evidence. And these events are adequately explained by a confluence of commercial influence, ultrarich paranoia about disease among those getting old enough to face death and without the moral constitution to face it, partisan ideology run amok in so-called news sources that happen to have become heavily subsidised by certain commercial interests, the stupidity and cupidity of the wealthy, the ideological seasaw of social media, and the utter incompetence of contemporary human institutions. Collectively, these forces are more than enough to support my more sceptical position. I do not seek to convince you. I have no need. I just wish to speak my mind.

Finally, I wish to say that one piece of the puzzle remains missing. It is required before we can put together a 'final' interpretation (if such a thing is ever possible). It is the memos and minutes of the meetings within the US Department of Defence before it seized control of the international public health apparatus. We absolutely require this to complete our picture of events, and so far we have *nothing* on it at all. Nothing. I can find no plausible reason to presume the WEF have influence over the DoD. The reverse is far more likely in my view.

I have significant suspicions, based on the academic paperwork around the 'biosecurity' concept going back decades... but still, the most likely interpretation to me seems relatively benign next to intentional depopulation. This is that knowing that SARS-CoV-2 was the result of immensely foolhardy 'gain-of-function' research - i.e. bioweapon research pursued for humanitarian purposes(!) - the DoD took the opportunity to test its ready-made biosecurity playbook, designed originally for defending against terrorist bioweapon attacks. This to me is an absolutely parsimonious explanation, uncontradicted by any of the evidence.

If and when any of that comes out, we will be able to build a complete model of these events. But even without, I feel that we do not have to leap as far as you and others sympathetic to your interpretation do. I will not ask you not to. I do not even seek to persuade you otherwise. I just think it's important for everyone to understand - in this, and in all things: there is another way.

With unlimited love,

Chris.

PS: I hope it is clear, I am not requesting debate here: I don't think that is actually necessary right now between those of us aware of the details of the Nonsense. The debate is essentially fruitless until it can be broken out of these tiny little corners of the internet you and I tend. I just wished to speak my mind, as you have spoken yours. Thank you for both the opportunity and the spur to do so.

Expand full comment
Harley Smedlapp's avatar

Bravo, Caroline ... Another superior analysis. Maybe I've missed some of your posts, but it seems a long time since I last read one of your pieces. And now I can only hope for more .... :-)

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts