The British Heartless Foundation – Deceitful Above All Things.

"Heart diseases. Stroke. Vascular dementia. Diabetes. They're all connected, and they're all under our microscope." So says the British Heart Foundation.

We fund around £100 million of research each year into all heart and circulatory diseases and the things that cause them. Heart diseases. Stroke. Vascular dementia. Diabetes. They're all connected, and they're all under our microscope. (What we do – The British Heart Foundation).

There is a paradox at the heart of every charitable foundation. That is, knowing when to stop. A genuine charity should seek its own eventual dissolution. To not do so is to become an end in itself on the backs of volunteers’ efforts and hard-earned public donations. Such a charity thrives on suffering.

And so it is with the British Heart Foundation, whose mission cannot (now) be the relief of suffering for those with heart conditions, or the funding of research into heart illness. The British Heart Foundation is now a self-perpetuating entity pivoted around its own survival. The idea was to work towards the prevention and cure for heart disease not to actively perpetuate it.

Given its stated mission, “Our vision is a world free from the fear of heart and circulatory diseases. A world without heartbreak,” I find it a travesty to read on its website blatant untruths regarding the current mRNA injections.

Here is a partial excerpt from their website:

Reports of myocarditis following any Covid-19 vaccine remain rare, and the cases that have been reported have usually been mild. Those affected have usually quickly felt better with rest and simple treatments. In most cases of myocarditis, heart function returns to normal.

Research suggests that overall, myocarditis is no more likely to be triggered by a Covid vaccine by than any other vaccine. 

It's also worth noting that Covid-19 itself is much more likely to cause myocarditis than the vaccine is, and people who are vaccinated have a much lower risk of getting other serious complications caused by Covid-19.

Where do I start? Reports and “incidents” of heart issues or myocarditis are most certainly not rare. I read on the Daily Sceptic that one in three young people report heart problems after the injections.

In one passenger transport workplace in my town, what has been revealed through regular medical examinations is that heart problems are noticeably increasing. Frequent tales of feeling unwell, massive blood clots, being unable to exercise and kidney damage can all be added to the heart issues. Anecdotal it may be, but if this is extrapolated outwards, our society is in deep trouble. The suffering does not alleviate quickly, people do not return to normal.

If, as they say, the “research suggests” that overall, myocarditis is no more likely to be triggered by a Covid vaccine by than any other vaccine, then all “vaccines” must produce symptoms and effects that are far more debilitating than the conditions they purport to prevent. I suggest they read Turtles All the Way Down, Vaccine Science and Myth. It is a game-changer.

It is the sly fudging of language in phrases such as “research suggests” that encourage some poor souls to roll their sleeves up and risk a great number of terrible harms or even death. Ironically of course, heart problems. The injections, as we now know, have generated thousands of new heart conditions in those who might never have suffered from such diseases otherwise. And so, like a computer programmer who invents viruses so that he may sell you anti-virus software, the British Heart Foundation promotes injections that will increase its raison d’etre.

Additionally, the idea that Covid-19 itself drives heart problems is questionable. Most ordinary people had not heard of myocarditis or pericarditis until the injection roll out. And now that we’re all becoming little experts, these words trip more easily off the tongue. Given the later attempts to blame a variety of illnesses on “long covid” it seems doubly strange that we did not hear of these conditions during the so-called pandemic, when people supposedly had covid. It is now coming out that even fewer people actually died from “Covid,” so I am at a loss to comprehend how anything but the injections could have caused the jump in cases of myocarditis and the like.

An additional point to make here. There is no such thing as “mild” myocarditis. I gather that some 25% of sufferers will not live beyond five years after a diagnosis. A sobering thought.

If it is possible for me, a mere humanities graduate, to follow reasonable arguments, why is it not possible for others to do so? Especially if, as a heart foundation your proclaimed goal is to facilitate a reduction of heart problems not the expansion of your empire and the production of many more heart problems. Of all the organisations that I expected to speak out urgently against these heart attack producing injections, I thought it would be the British Heart Foundation. (The situation is like a fireman who sets fires so that he will get paid to put them out).

I am still reeling from the astonishing discussions in Robert Malone’s new book, Lies My Government Told Me which I have on Kindle, and have yet to finish. The book exposes a level of corruption in the medical establishment that is breath-taking. If you have not grasped this yet, I might just warn you that The Sopranos or The Godfather were supposed to be fictional, not representative of the structures at the heart of our most trusted institutions.

At the heart of. How easily the terminology slips off the tongue and into prose. We talk of the stout hearted, the faint hearted, and I suppose as far as the British Heart Foundation is concerned, we must summon up the idea of the heartless. Another irony.

The heart is so often used to describe the complexities of human feelings, such as love and romance. Or, we think of the heart in terms of the biological, usually when something is wrong.

When we speak of “the heart of the matter,” we are grasping for something essential to whatever we happen to be concerned with. And it is this very human tendency to experience concern that is at the core of our being. Heidegger referred to this as “care,” and Mary Midgely refers to the essential quality of feeling without which, for a person, no real action can take place. As she puts it, in cases of depression, when feeling stops, people stop acting and they die as a consequence.

We know that the heart has its particular biological function, yet we set aside the literal and reach for the allegorical in our everyday lives. The heart is frequently brought to mind as the emblem of “care,” feeling or character.

We humans are concerned with more than mere “facts” or information. As Hannah Arendt alluded, meaning trumps knowledge. And so, we have divorced emotion from reason as if feeling has no part to play in an intelligent, rational life. Yet no action we take is done without some form of emotion. We could say that emotion is the beating heart of the human person, and the beating heart is essential to life. Charities are expressions of this drive to care, the impetus to show and act upon our concerns.

The British Heart Foundation makes its claims in blatant contradiction with human experience and even what we refer to as “science.” It must do this knowingly and with intention, actively suppressing what has been so clearly revealed. The injections do cause clotting, heart attacks, strokes, myocarditis, pericarditis and a whole host of other debilitating conditions. The very conditions that are under the British Heart Foundation’s “microscope” according to its website. Heartbreak indeed.

So, what is the British Heart Foundation’s concern or (if you like) its “heart’s desire?”

I suppose the answer to that is that others must suffer for the British Heart Foundation, in order for its survival. Like almost everything we now experience through the looking glass, it is an inversion of charity. It is the human sufferer who provides charity to the world’s most powerful actors with whom the British Heart Foundation has chosen to walk, in lockstep, in a heartbeat. A healthy patient is not a profitable one after all.

The prophet Jeremiah describes the heart as “deceitful above all things.”

“The heart is deceitful above all things,
And desperately wicked;
Who can know it?
I, the Lord, search the heart,
I test the mind,
Even to give every man according to his ways,
According to the fruit of his doings.

Here the heart’s desire is construed as corrupt, confusing evil and good, the heart sees its own desire and greed as the source of righteousness rather than God. The heart is desperately wicked. The powerful pharma companies and funders with whom the British Heart Foundation consorts may fool themselves that their desire for power can be made to appear as good, as philanthropy. However, God cannot be deceived.

In its casual dismissal of injection related heart problems, the British Heart Foundation is itself deceitful above all things, and therefore, in my humble estimation, desperately wicked.

Thank you for reading. Please share and subscribe, free of charge!